Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

dalton99a

(95,028 posts)

39. Excellent.

Reply to pnwmom (Original post)

Wed Oct 31, 2018, 07:00 PM

Oct 2018

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WATERGATE SCANDAL: GRAND JURY READY TO HIT RICHARD NIXON WITH 4 CRIMINAL CHARGES, NEWLY RELEASED DOC [View all] pnwmom Oct 2018 OP

So a sitting president CAN be indicted, despite what Spanky and his minions say. greatauntoftriplets Oct 2018 #1

The Constitution explicitly allows it. lagomorph777 Oct 2018 #24

That says they can be indicted only after they are removed from office. NYC Liberal Oct 2018 #32

Actually, no, it does not. lagomorph777 Nov 2018 #43

Sorry, but doesn't this prove the exact opposite? LiberalLovinLug Oct 2018 #36

I FEAR THE SAME... SkyDaddy7 Nov 2018 #41

Maybe that's what Barry Goldwater told him about the night before he decided to resign? George II Oct 2018 #2

Has Boozin' Brett already refused to hear the case? RhodeIslandOne Oct 2018 #3

See what Mr. Mueller is doing here? dawnie51 Oct 2018 #4

That was my first thought also NastyRiffraff Oct 2018 #5

Set the table, light the candles bucolic_frolic Oct 2018 #6

That must be Cheeto's great ambition as president at this point: sandensea Oct 2018 #7

don has a tattoo of roger stone,...with a tattoo of nixon on his back,.. on his 'shroomer Crutchez_CuiBono Oct 2018 #10

They should make a horror movie out of the orange oaf sandensea Oct 2018 #16

Nightmare on Mar-a-Lago could be a remake of Frogs csziggy Oct 2018 #21

Ah, yes. Those '70s creature features. sandensea Oct 2018 #23

Sharnado was pretty shlocky - and it got very popular csziggy Oct 2018 #25

+1 sandensea Oct 2018 #29

Tiny won't go as easily or gracefully as Nixon groundloop Oct 2018 #11

Ditto. eom littlemissmartypants Oct 2018 #14

+1 sandensea Oct 2018 #17

Nor as cleanly as his idol Adolf. He'll botch the poison and just puke on the rest of them erronis Oct 2018 #31

trump is going to try to change the subject for sure. BUT it won't be changed. shraby Oct 2018 #8

So they weren't prohibited from indicting either.. Historic NY Oct 2018 #9

"Prepared" to indict? cureautismnow Oct 2018 #12

Yeah, that's confusing. The dates don't makes sense. WhoWoodaKnew Oct 2018 #40

indeed . AllaN01Bear Oct 2018 #13

This has been reported before marylandblue Oct 2018 #15

Thanks! You're right that it appears to be nothing new. cureautismnow Oct 2018 #18

The documents weren't released before. n/t pnwmom Oct 2018 #19

I remember seeing some sort of indictment document marylandblue Oct 2018 #20

Just think of how many duforsure Oct 2018 #22

republicans are consistent: filthy liars and crooks Achilleaze Oct 2018 #26

We've got to give them an A in consistency. An F in democracy and normal decency. erronis Oct 2018 #33

Why were these unsealed now? CabalPowered Oct 2018 #27

I noticed that, too. Seems an obvious question. n/t pnwmom Oct 2018 #28

Found the answer CabalPowered Oct 2018 #37

Thanks! pnwmom Oct 2018 #38

What a perfect analysis of cheetox... Maxheader Oct 2018 #30

Hope Whiny boy got to see that article . . . pdsimdars Oct 2018 #34

Can't wait Goodmax Oct 2018 #35

Excellent. dalton99a Oct 2018 #39

So glad to see this. Thank you, pnwmom. n/t Judi Lynn Nov 2018 #42