Latest Breaking News

LiberalLovinLug

(14,721 posts)

53. The ARE a legitimate news source.

Tue Jul 11, 2023, 06:41 PM

Jul 2023

Unless you agree that MSNBC, The Guardian, the Washington Post, and other sites commonly sourced in here as well are not legitimate. How do you dismiss those sources if Raw Story source them, but not DU for doing the same?

You are protesting a liberal news opinion, and news gathering website because they use "emotionally charged" headlines? Firstly, which one of those headlines in their page today that I listed was too emotionally charged for you to handle? Please explain how they are.

Also I might add if the behaviour of the modern day Republican party does not get you emotionally charged to match any of those headlines, then I don't know what to say. IMO they are too tame if anything.

BTW about the MSM being the examples of not having sensationalist looking headlines/imagery...

?c=16x9&q=w_800,c_fill

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

59 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge Aileen Cannon grants 'unnecessary' delay in Trump documents case [View all] riversedge Jul 2023 OP

I'm not going to get upset over four days Fiendish Thingy Jul 2023 #1

I think the four day delay is of no consequence to agingdem Jul 2023 #3

Yup. Nt Fiendish Thingy Jul 2023 #5

I agree TheRealNorth Jul 2023 #7

this will never go to trial before the election (maybe ever) if she is the judge prodigitalson Jul 2023 #25

I would bet it's the start of a long, long series of delays... Kablooie Jul 2023 #55

I think (and I could be wrong)... agingdem Jul 2023 #56

I wonder how much IQ45 will have to spend for ANY lawyer who's application would pass muster Hugh_Lebowski Jul 2023 #11

They'll find another excuse to delay it again. ificandream Jul 2023 #20

Trump's lawyers are already putting forth motions to delay the trial Fiendish Thingy Jul 2023 #21

I agree. msfiddlestix Jul 2023 #39

That judge seems determined to give trump and Nauta every little break. brush Jul 2023 #2

tweet from Raw story about OP........ riversedge Jul 2023 #4

Raw Story is nothing but a click bait outrage farming enterprise. Nt Fiendish Thingy Jul 2023 #6

Raw Story doesn't have Pullitzer prize winning journalists gab13by13 Jul 2023 #9

Agreed, and if I recall most of those Pulitzer journalists pushed the WMD myth, and the lie how the JohnSJ Jul 2023 #15

Additionally it steals real news organizations articles. then asks for donations to aide Raw Sto emulatorloo Jul 2023 #16

Exactly- they report on other's reporting Fiendish Thingy Jul 2023 #17

I agree. Mickju Jul 2023 #35

Raw Story was one of the very first liberal point of view web news sites. LiberalLovinLug Jul 2023 #40

There are far better sites out there Fiendish Thingy Jul 2023 #41

+1 onenote Jul 2023 #42

So what if their front page is set up to have highly charged text. LiberalLovinLug Jul 2023 #43

The MSM is t supposed to be emotionally charged at all Fiendish Thingy Jul 2023 #48

The ARE a legitimate news source. LiberalLovinLug Jul 2023 #53

I'm not rejecting the sources the Raw Story steals from Fiendish Thingy Jul 2023 #58

At the very least she should recuse. She shouldn't even be a federal judge. hadEnuf Jul 2023 #22

The only thing that's surprising is that it was Trump that proposed the delay be only 4 days. onenote Jul 2023 #29

This message was self-deleted by its author NH Ethylene Jul 2023 #44

WRONG. Before Cannon ruled, Trump filed a response proposing July 18 onenote Jul 2023 #45

Ahhh. I didn't read it carefully enough. Ty. NH Ethylene Jul 2023 #46

Shouldn't the rules decided in trumps case be the same? oldsoftie Jul 2023 #8

The rules don't have to be the same for Nauta, gab13by13 Jul 2023 #12

That's what next week's CIPA hearing is all about Fiendish Thingy Jul 2023 #18

This delay doesn't affect Jack Smith's timeline, but, gab13by13 Jul 2023 #10

I think now would be a great time for Jack Smith to agingdem Jul 2023 #24

Since Smith agreed to this very short delay, I doubt he thinks it bullshit. onenote Jul 2023 #28

the problem is she's got precedent... agingdem Jul 2023 #34

The delay was primarily because Nauta's principal counsel has a scheduling conflict onenote Jul 2023 #36

they're not conspiring...Trump has already filed a agingdem Jul 2023 #38

Mostly a non-event (rescheduling CIPA scheduling conference by a few days), LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2023 #13

Nice having a judge in your pocket. From SC Justice to Federal District. republianmushroom Jul 2023 #14

This article is confusing. it's a 4-day delay but Jack Smith is talking about an "indefinite" delay? Novara Jul 2023 #19

Of course its confusing. It's RawStory. onenote Jul 2023 #23

Poorly written Novara Jul 2023 #47

And Smith went along with it? onenote Jul 2023 #49

He did. Probably because it was only four days Novara Jul 2023 #50

So you do think "he fell for it." Okay then. onenote Jul 2023 #51

Maybe he's giving judge Qannon some rope to hang herself with Novara Jul 2023 #52

wait until you see her next trick prodigitalson Jul 2023 #26

Facts: the four day delay was proposed by Trump. It was agreed to by Smith. onenote Jul 2023 #27

Recommended. H2O Man Jul 2023 #30

He finally found a lawyer, who sure as heck needs time. elleng Jul 2023 #31

This is a bad start. 4 days doesn't sound like much but nevergiveup Jul 2023 #32

I wonder who is paying for Walt Nauta's attorneys. Couldn't be TFG as he doesn't japple Jul 2023 #33

This message was self-deleted by its author onenote Jul 2023 #37

Cannon will work with Trump to delay everything until sometime after the election. Kablooie Jul 2023 #54

Has DOJ described a 4-day delay as "unnecessary"? brooklynite Jul 2023 #57

After a review by forum hosts, locking........ Omaha Steve Jul 2023 #59