Private autopsy claims Vonderrit Myers shot while fleeing

[KingCharlemagne]

107. That is a damned good question and it goes to what the philosopher of science Karl Popper

called the principle of 'falsifiability'. IOW, for any hypothesis to be logically valid, there must exist some set of facts that could nullify that hypothesis.

So, in this case, you are asking Heavon05 what set of facts would or could nullify his hypothesis of a conspiracy to plant evidence.

I cannot answer for Heaven05 but I can say that I have lost confidence entirely in the judicial system of St. Louis County and St. Louis City, including its forensic divisions and its judiciary. I would say that, were the U.S. Dept of Justice (the FBI) to mount its own inquiry and announce that, yes, Myers had gunshot residue on his hands not placed there by some other person or persons, I would accept that I am wrong and that Myers did indeed discharge a firearm that night. But for the St. Louis City PD to say it? Come on, give me a break. They're not exactly an honest broker here, now are they?