Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH - Friday, 6 January 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)45. FDA Gives Up on Antibiotic Restrictions in Livestock
http://civileats.com/2012/01/03/fda-gives-up-on-antibiotic-restrictions-in-livestock/
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pulled a Scrooge move just before Christmas. The agency published an entry in the Federal Register declaring that it will end its attempt at mandatory restrictions on the use of antibiotics in animal agriculture. The agency isnt advertising the shift, though: This news would have remained a secret if not for Maryn McKennas Superbug blog over at Wired. McKenna, who specializes in writing about antibiotics and their link to pathogens, caught the Federal Register notice...This is a sorry end to a process that began in 1977 (!), but McKenna created an excellent timeline that traces the history of the issue back to the 1950s. In 2009, the Obama administration breathed new life into a moribund process because the top two Obama appointees at the FDA, Commissioner Margaret Hamburg and her then-deputy Joshua Sharfstein, strongly supported restricting antibiotic use in agriculture. But despite Hamburg and Sharfsteins many supportive statements, the FDA has only produced a draft set of voluntary guidelines. And, with this latest announcement, it looks like thats as far as theyre willing to go.
Inaction has consequences: According to the vast majority of microbiologists and public health experts, restrictions on agricultural uses are key to preserving the effectiveness of antibiotics as well as to preventing the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria like MRSA and salmonella Heidelberg (cause of last summers record-breaking ground turkey recall). And its no small dosage: Every year 29 million pounds of antibiotics are given to animals often via their feed. That figure represents 80 percent of all antibiotics used in the U.S.
Consumer groups like the Union of Concerned Scientists and the Pew Charitable Trusts have been calling for an end to the practice for years. But its not just outsiders who are fed up with the agencys work on this issue; the administrations own watchdog group, the Government Accountability Office, recently gave the agency a failing grade in the subject...In many ways, this issue parallels the ongoing battle over BPA, the endocrine-disrupting chemical used in food packaging, plastics, and register receipts. When finally pushed to ban the chemical, the FDA declared that its hands were tied by regulatory hurdles and jurisdictional questions. Yet soon after, the industry lobbying group American Chemical Council responded to consumer anger and petitioned the agency to go ahead and ban BPA. Only then did the FDA indicate it would follow through. In other words, the FDA is admitting that as long as the industry opposes it, the agency cant keep antibiotics out of our meat and dairy products (nor, for that matter, can it ensure that antibiotics will remain effective). Its also admitting it has no real power over the industries it regulates. If the agency continues to favor industrys concerns over the public health, it begs the question: Who exactly is looking out for us?
On the brighter side, several organizations, including the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Center for Science in the Public Interest, and Public Citizen have actually filed a lawsuit against the FDA demanding the agency restrict antibiotics in animals. This is promising, because courts have shown more interest in defending science than the federal agencies (see this example from last year regarding rBST/rBGH in milk). So it may just fall to a federal judge to determine whats truly good for the public interest. Of course, it would be nice if the agency actually tasked with that responsibility would step up to the plate. But I guess thats just too much to ask.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pulled a Scrooge move just before Christmas. The agency published an entry in the Federal Register declaring that it will end its attempt at mandatory restrictions on the use of antibiotics in animal agriculture. The agency isnt advertising the shift, though: This news would have remained a secret if not for Maryn McKennas Superbug blog over at Wired. McKenna, who specializes in writing about antibiotics and their link to pathogens, caught the Federal Register notice...This is a sorry end to a process that began in 1977 (!), but McKenna created an excellent timeline that traces the history of the issue back to the 1950s. In 2009, the Obama administration breathed new life into a moribund process because the top two Obama appointees at the FDA, Commissioner Margaret Hamburg and her then-deputy Joshua Sharfstein, strongly supported restricting antibiotic use in agriculture. But despite Hamburg and Sharfsteins many supportive statements, the FDA has only produced a draft set of voluntary guidelines. And, with this latest announcement, it looks like thats as far as theyre willing to go.
Inaction has consequences: According to the vast majority of microbiologists and public health experts, restrictions on agricultural uses are key to preserving the effectiveness of antibiotics as well as to preventing the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria like MRSA and salmonella Heidelberg (cause of last summers record-breaking ground turkey recall). And its no small dosage: Every year 29 million pounds of antibiotics are given to animals often via their feed. That figure represents 80 percent of all antibiotics used in the U.S.
Consumer groups like the Union of Concerned Scientists and the Pew Charitable Trusts have been calling for an end to the practice for years. But its not just outsiders who are fed up with the agencys work on this issue; the administrations own watchdog group, the Government Accountability Office, recently gave the agency a failing grade in the subject...In many ways, this issue parallels the ongoing battle over BPA, the endocrine-disrupting chemical used in food packaging, plastics, and register receipts. When finally pushed to ban the chemical, the FDA declared that its hands were tied by regulatory hurdles and jurisdictional questions. Yet soon after, the industry lobbying group American Chemical Council responded to consumer anger and petitioned the agency to go ahead and ban BPA. Only then did the FDA indicate it would follow through. In other words, the FDA is admitting that as long as the industry opposes it, the agency cant keep antibiotics out of our meat and dairy products (nor, for that matter, can it ensure that antibiotics will remain effective). Its also admitting it has no real power over the industries it regulates. If the agency continues to favor industrys concerns over the public health, it begs the question: Who exactly is looking out for us?
On the brighter side, several organizations, including the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Center for Science in the Public Interest, and Public Citizen have actually filed a lawsuit against the FDA demanding the agency restrict antibiotics in animals. This is promising, because courts have shown more interest in defending science than the federal agencies (see this example from last year regarding rBST/rBGH in milk). So it may just fall to a federal judge to determine whats truly good for the public interest. Of course, it would be nice if the agency actually tasked with that responsibility would step up to the plate. But I guess thats just too much to ask.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
ECB/Fed Support for the European Banking System – 750 billion USD, and counting …
Demeter
Jan 2012
#27
The A-List: Steven Rattner - Bail-outs will always be needed to fix capitalism’s flaws
Demeter
Jan 2012
#33
Obama to Make Recess Appointment of Richard Cordray to Head Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Demeter
Jan 2012
#40
Quelle Surprise! Fed Sees We Have a Big Mortgage Problem (IT ONLY TOOK...HOW MANY YEARS?)
Demeter
Jan 2012
#42
New Criterion Tells Us-- Ditch Social Security Because All Min. Wage Earners Can Become Millionaires
Demeter
Jan 2012
#50
I used their Portra film for my wedding and portrait business...it was phenomenal...
rfranklin
Jan 2012
#74