Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Art Garfunkel Net Worth: 45 MILLION [View all]DanTex
(20,709 posts)119. You're talking about the GOP. Both Hillary and Bernie back the people.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
177 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So are the wealthy people who support Hillary, since she is proposing to raise taxes on the wealthy.
DanTex
Jan 2016
#65
You do understand the difference between Ben, Jerry and Jamie Dimond, don't you?
pangaia
Jan 2016
#114
There's also the difference that Ben and Jerry have never screwed over workers or entire countries
Ken Burch
Jan 2016
#131
It's funny that you call Dimon Hillary's "bff." Just another example of how detached Bernie
DanTex
Jan 2016
#134
In your opinion. In Trump's opinion, supporting Trump is an act of pure goodness.
DanTex
Jan 2016
#149
Oh no! The Evil Ben and Jerry...I thiught Bernie was a commie who hates success
Armstead
Jan 2016
#97
Seems to be the yardstick when it comes to HRC supporters. Or Hillary herself, for that
DanTex
Jan 2016
#107
It's different if you support a candidate who backs the people instead of the rich.
Ken Burch
Jan 2016
#117
Of course there is. Rich people who don't back Bernie get bashed, rich people who back Bernie
DanTex
Jan 2016
#132
hmmmmmm.... I know all the millionaires who support Bernie are just different
boston bean
Jan 2016
#3
Well, I guess I would need to know yours, cause everyone else but bernies millionaires seem to fall
boston bean
Jan 2016
#21
They are just the evil 1% enabling the establishment to keep screwing us over, right?
boston bean
Jan 2016
#28
Getting rich as a musician isn't the same as getting rich by exploiting people.
Ken Burch
Jan 2016
#124
Being in Congress for how many years? Having your family work for you? Having your wife benefit?
KittyWampus
Jan 2016
#60
Art should give up 44 M of those earnings in taxes, is that what you are saying?
boston bean
Jan 2016
#43
Bernie is not against people making money, its about fairness. trash this tread is an easy one
litlbilly
Jan 2016
#44
I'm about to do that, based on the ridiculous nature of arguments from these posters...
MrMickeysMom
Jan 2016
#47
I'll take Rep. Lewis, Gwen Carr, Sybrina Fulton, Lucia McBath, Gabby Giffords, Dolores Hueta's
lunamagica
Jan 2016
#88
He earned it honestly with his own hard work and talent. What's the problem? nt.
polly7
Jan 2016
#61
What a crock. Fail. Wealth does not disqualify one for agreeing that there is income
libdem4life
Jan 2016
#82
Is he trying to get corporate or billionaire welfare, etc.? No of course not.n/t
Skwmom
Jan 2016
#93
You know, I'm getting very tired of Clinton supporters assuming we are complete morons.
jeff47
Jan 2016
#109
Bernie's distortions that all rich people are bad has come back to bite him.
Dawson Leery
Jan 2016
#127
Oh it is silly season for sure. Newsflash Boston Bean, Simon & Garfunkle ain't Goldman Sachs
bklyncowgirl
Jan 2016
#157