Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
52. BTW Hillary's family gets
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 12:15 PM
Mar 2016

paid by all the connections............

For Clintons, a Hedge Fund in the Family
By MATTHEW GOLDSTEIN and STEVE EDERMARCH 22, 2015

Since marrying Chelsea Clinton five years ago, Marc Mezvinsky, a money manager, appears to have settled into his life as Bill and Hillary Clinton’s son-in-law. He has regularly appeared at charitable events, once introducing the former president at the Clinton Foundation’s celebrity poker tournament by dryly saying, “You may have heard of my father-in-law.” And at the recent N.B.A. All-Star Game, Mr. Mezvinsky took a seat next to Mr. Clinton and his partner in charitable endeavors, Dikembe Mutombo, the former basketball star.

Beyond the glamour, being part of the Clinton family has provided Mr. Mezvinsky with another perk: access to wealthy investors with ties to the Clintons.

When Mr. Mezvinsky and his partners began raising money in 2011 for a new hedge fund firm, Eaglevale Partners, a number of investors in the firm were longtime supporters of the Clintons, according to interviews and financial documents reviewed by The New York Times. Tens of millions of dollars raised by Eaglevale can be attributed to investors with some relationship or link to the Clintons.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/23/business/dealbook/for-clintons-a-hedge-fund-in-the-family.html?_r=0

Didn't read it but just more whining I assume form Hillary fans. nt Logical Mar 2016 #1
Oh...no whining. I appreciate being introduced to a new source. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #2
Seriously, you didn't see the breathless thread that claimed Clinton used a campaign slush fund? randome Mar 2016 #3
I think Skinner's post about the OP, and the recs it got, says it all.... msanthrope Mar 2016 #11
Awful. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #4
And you know what? Never would have known HALF of this without that original msanthrope Mar 2016 #5
Just To be clear ... these are not ordinary "in-kind" donations that ... NurseJackie Mar 2016 #6
No--Skinner kindly went on to explain that the inkind donations msanthrope Mar 2016 #8
Well then ... this IS concerning ... NurseJackie Mar 2016 #13
Wow . . . you sure are convincing me to vote for Hillary . . . NOT. Vinca Mar 2016 #7
Not my job. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #9
Seriously? If I ever run for office, please promise not to support me. Vinca Mar 2016 #15
Look....if the words "President Trump" don't motivate you to the polling booth, what msanthrope Mar 2016 #18
President Sanders motivates me Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #23
That's the only thing that motivates me Steve. Fear just doesn't work. Autumn Mar 2016 #48
Are you asking me to vote for Jill Stein? nt artislife Mar 2016 #49
Faculty politics 1939 Mar 2016 #10
I was surprised to read that Jane Sanders did not support instituting tenure. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #12
. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #14
Many thanks to the jury!!!! nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #16
I didn't even notice the FreeBeacon link until now! That is awesome karma! randome Mar 2016 #20
Yes...I thank the original OP for giving us such a great source. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #31
LOL! Cali_Democrat Mar 2016 #39
You did a good job of bamboozling Armstead Mar 2016 #43
you think the jury was bamboozled? msanthrope Mar 2016 #45
Juror #1 gets it. NurseJackie Mar 2016 #28
whow. just whow. At least the riversedge Mar 2016 #33
Interesting what real information that other op brought us here. Nt NCTraveler Mar 2016 #17
That OP was very helpful in providing loads and loads of links. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #19
The difference that you fail to see in your eager effort retrowire Mar 2016 #21
I would think the main point of the OP is to conclusively cancel out the original OP. randome Mar 2016 #24
i thought Skinner's rebuttal did that sooo.. retrowire Mar 2016 #26
Obviously some didn't bother -or chose to ignore- those parts of the thread. randome Mar 2016 #41
Sander's family officially work for the campaign... retrowire Mar 2016 #44
What was the point of the original thread if not a poor attempt to trash Clinton? randome Mar 2016 #50
well, it clearly was that. and it was disproved. so? nt retrowire Mar 2016 #51
Bernie pays his interns, Hillary does not Omaha Steve Mar 2016 #22
Bravo/a ejbr Mar 2016 #25
Well done mcar Mar 2016 #27
Bill Clinton, anyone? Barack_America Mar 2016 #29
I know, right? There seems to be quite the blind spot there. djean111 Mar 2016 #37
Who cares? Seriously.....who cares msanthrope Mar 2016 #46
The same people who expect us to care about old stuff about Bernie and Jane? djean111 Mar 2016 #47
Everything I wrote about is this century. Bill's dalliances? msanthrope Mar 2016 #59
Maybe they don't matter to you. That's cool. djean111 Mar 2016 #61
I don't give a crap about sex acts between adults. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #63
That's fine. I don't either. djean111 Mar 2016 #65
OFFS.....people lie about their affairs. It's what they do. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #66
This issue doesn't bother me for either candidate actually Arazi Mar 2016 #30
"FEC regulations and campaign accounting." wyldwolf Mar 2016 #32
Math is Hard. After Lousiana, though, I expect exploding heads. msanthrope Mar 2016 #34
Seriously, math is hard. And there are other electoral concepts that are difficult... wyldwolf Mar 2016 #36
Don't care for these tit-for-tat posts Dem2 Mar 2016 #35
Your other thread got locked UglyGreed Mar 2016 #38
If one accepts the premise that payments through a campaign fund are unethical... randome Mar 2016 #40
Paying people to work is UglyGreed Mar 2016 #42
BTW Hillary's family gets UglyGreed Mar 2016 #52
According to reliable sources she has paid herself $250.000 . nt ladjf Mar 2016 #53
Didn't you read kydo Mar 2016 #54
I read all of that but couldn't tell which was which. ladjf Mar 2016 #57
Good for her for being able to make money kydo Mar 2016 #58
The Daily Caller? I'm not surprised. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #56
Glass houses and all. bettyellen Mar 2016 #55
Yes.... all from one source. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #60
Actually....it's a number of sources flowing from that one rag. And since you rec'd msanthrope Mar 2016 #62
Typical MaggieD Mar 2016 #64
k&r DesertRat Mar 2016 #67
Things that make you go Hmmmmm. Thanks for keeping up! Hekate Mar 2016 #68
always. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #70
Like Trump's supporters it doesn't matter what is said or proven...supporters for both HRC and BS Jitter65 Mar 2016 #69
K&R, something fishy in the Sanders campaign itsrobert Mar 2016 #71
Would never have known it, but for a BS supporter providing the link. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #72
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie paid his family ou...»Reply #52