2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Jeff Weaver- worst surrogate ever [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)legance?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2014818
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Ageist, sexist, you name it. A horrible post that is beneath DU
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri May 20, 2016, 02:57 PM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I'me not a fan of Clinton's and find this inappropriate. Hide it.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Disgusting. Not sure what this poster is even doing at DU.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Suggesting Hillary is not elegant, as she has been touted to be, is neither sexist or ageist. Elegance is not about sex or age. A young man can lack elegance. However, alerter, if YOU find every pic of a 67 year old woman that has not been airbrushed and photoshopped to make her look 37 sexist and ageist, you might examine your own biases.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Eff this crap. I'm sick of it.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Close, but does not cross the line.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given