Reply #63: I find many of your comments questionable. [View All]

[mzmolly]

In effect all my client was doing was DELAYING a reduction in their standard of living is a way that WOULD CAUSE THEM GREATER HARM IN THE LONG RUN. The same with a Doctor refusing to see a Client who refuses to do what is NEEDED. The Doctor (like a Lawyer) has to keep the best interest of his client at heart. If the best interest and what the client wants is NOT the same the Doctor (like a Lawyer) has to tell the client of that unpleasant fact. If the Client still refuses to follow what is being recommended by the Doctor, the Doctor ha the RIGHT TO SAY I WILL NOT TREAT YOU. In my opinion such an action is not only permitted BUT required. It is required because the real expert is the DOCTOR not the Patient. The Doctor as the Expert treating a patient NOT BY THE BEST MEDICALLY DETERMINABLE WAY, is opening himself up to a malpractice suit.

I feel that MOST VACCINES ARE CAUSING GREATER HARM IN THE LONG RUN then most of the disease we are trying to combat.

You are also saying my Doctor has a right to determine MY BEST INTERESTS FOR ME.

Tell me, would you represent a patient in a malpractice suit who was bullied by their doctor into a vaccination that caused their to child suffer or die as a result?

http://www.wdolaw.com/cases/vaccine_injuries.htm

WDOCL represents hundreds of injured children and their families seeking compensation for the devastating mercury-induced injuries caused by the unnecessary exposures to thimerosal. WDOCL attorneys are leaders in the effort to win compensation for the families in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (or "Vaccine Court"), a no-fault administrative program created by Congress to provide relief for vaccine-injured children. Families who file claims for compensation in Vaccine Court also have the right to later seek relief in the court system after they go through the Vaccine Court procedures, and WDOCL represents families in those lawsuits.