You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #37: I also remember the days of back-alley abortions, but I'm not so [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. I also remember the days of back-alley abortions, but I'm not so
sure this society would go back to that wholesale. Remember, one of the reasons coat-hanger abortions existed was that if you were UNMARRIED and pregnant, you became a social leper, were unmarriageable, and were considered a total tramp.

That social fabric no longer exists. We don't do that to "unwed mothers" anymore. We don't even use the term "unwed mother" and I suspect most young people would laugh out loud at the term. Also remember that, back then, one of the problems with being pregnant and unmarried was that you would be unable to support your child without a working husband. Nowadays, most women work at a job their whole lives and can support themselves and a child with no man in sight. And they do.

So, a lot of the social pressure to not be pregnant is simply gone. If Roe V. Wade is overturned, what I would love to see is millions of pregnant women (those who don't want the baby and would have had an abortion) go ahead and have the baby and simply give it up for adoption immediately. Can you imagine the glut of little babies clogging up the adoption/welfare/social services systems? Cuz I can guarantee you that all those lily-white evangelicals in Omaha aren't going to be adopting too many little black kids. And they are already having trouble finding enough black or multi-racial families to take in the children being born now -- add hundreds of thousands to that number, and keep on with the destruction of the economy, and even fewer families will be able to adopt. They won't even be able to take care of the kids they have already.

So, I think it is incorrect to assume things will revert to the way they were back in the 50's. The whole social aspect is totally different. No one blinks an eye at an unmarried pregnant woman today, and believe me, it was totally different back then.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC