You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think Clinton is being "Roved"... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:22 AM
Original message
I think Clinton is being "Roved"...
Advertisements [?]
First, Clinton speaks candidly about the poor job BushCo has done post-Katrina. He talks very openly about the foolishness of cutting taxes for the rich, during wartime and after a huge national disaster.

Then Clinton travels to the South to meet with hurricane survivors. He actually listens to them--without a script or an ominous church in the background. Clinton looked like a pResident should--doing all of the things that Junior can't--because he's too afraid, too insulated, too scripted.

In short, Clinton upstaged Junior. He made him look like the scared, impotent little toad that he is, by demonstrating how a real president acts.

Then what do we have a week later? A big-box story--nicely packaged--about Clinton getting the Saudis to donate money to his library. We even have a high-level witness in former FBI director Louis Freeh. The story is vociferously pushed by ALL of the right-wing pundits.

Next, who surfaces? Kathleen Willey and Juanita Broaddrick. And they're touring the Clinton Library? These women did not conjure up this publicity stunt on their own. This is another packaged stunt, that was shelved--as long as mouths remained shut. Clinton dared to speak the truth--and now he must pay.

Someone in charge of dirty tricks and blackmail, pulled the trigger.

I always knew that something like this was going on. It's how they keep people silent. I bet they have massive amounts of dirt on most high-level officials.

Thoughts, anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC