You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #160: This is why it is hard to discuss - no specifics - just generalities. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
PamW Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #157
160. This is why it is hard to discuss - no specifics - just generalities.
The International Panel on Fissile Materials shows you are making false claims
=========================

Kris for once in your damned life could you dispense with the generalized indictment
and make a specific claim?

What have I said that the IPFM disagrees with?

This is why I can't discuss thing with you.

You just make broad sweeping generalizations, with no content; so one can't
refute it.

Most of the time it all comes down to the fact that you don't understand
what I'm saying or you have some other misconception.


PamW

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC