Reply #173: As usual, you really miss the point. [View All]

[SpoonFed]

There "could" be some exponential relationship between shuttle launches and ozone level decreases. I wasn't positing that there "is" but that simply there "could" be an relationship that was not linear. Hand waving bull to the effect there should be 1/2 as much ozone because there has been 1/2 of the magic number of shuttle launches therefore doesn't cut it as it is not the only possible explanation.

You on the other hand come again in like the arrogant donkey's ass and miss the point and make your own proclamations as to what is true and correct, missing the inherent flaw in the statements being presented. You can't see trivial flaws in your own logical when pointed out to you either, so I'm not surprised.

So in summary, oh wise one, the most casual observer does not need to comprehend differential calculus, nor believe your almighty proclamations as to the veracity of a proposition which claims a causal relationship between shuttle launches and the depletion of the ozone layer; they just have to recognize the trivial mistakes and flustered bluster which comes from you and other posters that believe they are operating on a level so much above the rest of us mere mortals. It's the belief that is the amusing part to me.