Reply #15: Welcome to the world of sanity BUT ... [View All]

[HamdenRice]

try not to focus too much on CD of the towers. I say that because of a post I once read by Minstrel Boy who said that once a theory depends on technical details, then there will always be two sides to debate the issue -- as in, those are squibs; not those are compressed air venting; the fire was x degrees; not the fire was 2x degrees; and on and on forever.

Images of the collapse and CD theory brought me to the MIHOP position, but I now think it is, oddly, not that important. There is so much abundant evidence of MIHOP in the mainstream media concerning movements of money, options, and intelligence personnel, and connections between the perpetrators and the government; and the bizarre mischaracterizations of the hijackers and their behavior that you can prove MIHOP without getting bogged down in the technical, where there will always be "engineers" spreading disinformation and confusion.