Reply #48: I don't want to get into a full-blown discussion ... [View All]

[NanceGreggs]

... about the events of 9/11, especially all of the contradictory aspects to the "official story".

But let me say one thing, and leave it at that:

The attacks of 9/11 were, we are to believe, A CRIME perpetrated by "terrorists" on the American people.

And yet, the World Trade Centre was never treated as, nor secured as, a crime scene - which it should have been, had any real investigation been planned. Debris started being cleared right away; steel was sold as scrap and shipped out immediately.

Imagine any other administration being in power on that day. Heads would have rolled; all kinds of people within the gov't would have been called on the carpet to explain their actions, or lack thereof. The president (had it NOT been Bush) would have demanded reports on his desk IMMEDIATELY as to what happened, what went wrong, what could have been done differently to avoid such a catastrophe, what security could be tightened in future, etc.

This administration had to be SHAMED into action by the 9/11 widows and other interested parties, and then they dragged their feet at every turn. Bush and Cheney only agreed to be 'interviewed' on the topic if they were questioned TOGETHER, and NOT UNDER OATH.

Ask yourself if Bush and Cheney acted, at any juncture, like an administration who had been surprised by what happened, and determined to get to the bottom of it.