Reply #57: I'm sure not interested in covering for that gang [View All]

[OnTheOtherHand]

One thing that happens in a lot of these discussions is that people use phrases such as 'election theft,' but the meaning morphs.

If you read your post in the context of the entire thread, you'll see why it wasn't clear to me that "all (you were) trying to say" was that they set up a link, etc. As I understand it, a central problematic of this thread is whether Kerry could have won the election if he had refused to concede. (There are lots of other ways of framing the question, but most of them have to do with what Kerry should have done after the election.) In that context, some folks are saying 'obviously Kerry won,' and some folks are saying 'not so much.' But of course that opens into all the other facts and questions about Ohio 2004 (and beyond).

BTW, in case I forget to mention this somewhere else arguably more appropriate, the skankiest 2004 numbers I've seen (on a wide scale) were from New Mexico.