Reply #10: I disagree [View All]

[m berst]

I have seen some very calm and specific posts from long time, thoughtful and trustworthy DU members that raise legitimate questions about a variety of investigations, only to see them quickly ganged up on with hints and implications that they are infiltrators who are trying to sop investigations.

I don't know for sure, of course, but it looks for all the world to me like there is a switcheroo going on. What better way to "pass" here than to vehemently defend investigations, and to accuse solid DU members of being the disruptors. I see the ones objecting to the supposed disruptions as causing the most disruption, and I see the calm and rational critics of various efforts from some of Bev's work, to the Cybernet "investigations" getting jumped on and attacked for daring to express any caution or raise any questions.

That is just what I am seeing.



on edit - grammar