You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #78: Hi [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. Hi
Edited on Sat Jan-07-06 06:36 PM by manic expression
I don't think you're breaking any rules, so it's no problem. Thanks for taking the time to respond.

Yeah, I may not be the most clear, but I think I get the gist across, at least.

Anyway, here are some examples:

If you take anything, it follows the same exact path. Empires, people, ecosystems, rocks, cars, anything. All things are made, all things live, all things end in a continual cycle. This alone shows that there is a constant, something that pervades all the boundaries that divide. I feel that because we can see such a commonality to all things, there must be a deeper commonality as well. This deeper entity is the true form of the individual self, and that is what makes up "divinity" (this is all in my opinion, by the way).

I hope that made sense.

Now, on to gravity. The way there is an attraction between all things is a fact and no one can seriously deny this. Now, this means that all things are connected in a physical way. If everything is connected in a physical way, that indicates a connection in a deeper way. That was the point.

I really hope that made sense.

These kinds of parallels can be found in many other things as well, and I think they strongly show the existence of divinity. Remember, when one sees smoke, one knows there is fire, so 100% concrete evidence is not needed IMO.

I know I'll never convince an atheist of anything, but then again, I've never convinced many people when it comes to politics, either. If you look at some of my discussions with other atheists/agnostics, we've come to an "agree to disagree" point, and I am very satisfied with that.

The thing is that I leave a lot of room for interpretation and I make general statements. Why? Well, because it is reflective of the idea, not the specific example. (Just as there is an infinite number of lines that you can make from a circle's edge to its center...) There is no one answer for anything. Furthermore, it is general because it touches upon something so broad. That may be why it seems "grand sounding".

Thanks again for the response. I hope I addressed everything.

Edited to add: "in a continual cycle"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC