You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #142: I totally agree. . . [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
MaraJade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #69
142. I totally agree. . .
Most of the posters here were not even alive during the VietNam war. But I WAS. My brother was
there and my mother cried every night as we watched the "Huntley-Brinkley" report and heard the
body counts. . .

The VietCong were famous for the guerilla tactic of wearing street clothes and mingling with
sympathetic villagers. From these villages (the populace of which had their favor curried by
VietCong so-called "aid", ) the VietCong would launch attacks against the South Vietnamese and the
Americans. After a sniper or other attack, the killers would simply disappear into the villages,
literally hiding behind the women and children there.

This is what Hezbollah has done.

They have curried favor with the Lebanese citizens by using Irani and Syrian petro-dollars to supply
the "aid" that the elected Lebanese government could not supply. In this way, the Hezbollah, unelected
quazi-government established a foothold in Lebanon and put their infrastructure in among the populace
whom the are actually using as human shields.

Relying upon the honor of the Israeli government, Hezbollah then felt free to rain missiles down
upon Israeli citizens in the belief that the Israeli government would not respond out of respect
for the citizens of Lebanon.

This is similar to a situation where a neighbor irresponsible allows a criminal to shoot out of their
upstairs window, raining destruction upon the neighborhood. I believe that such an irresponsible
homeowner can blame absolutly no one if the community assaults their home to drag the criminal out.
Who would reasonably blame them? The community has a right to remove a neighborhood danger,
even if the householder who allowed the danger does not agree. And if the householder or his wife
blocks or attempts to block such action, and is injured, so what? It was the irresponsible
householder who allowed the attacks on the neighborhood in the first place.

I am sorry about any "innocent" people who are caught up in this. But after hearing that thousands of
the people in the affected areas supported Hezbollah and were in favor of the attacks being launched
from their own neighborhoods, I must say that they knew that particular job was dangerous when they took it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC