Reply #25: Domestic vs. Intnl Surveillance and OBL [View All]

[EVDebs]

Total Surveillance
http://www.motherjones.com/interview/2005/12/albrecht.h ...

Coupling this insidious technology with purposely erroneous background checks

Who is checking the background checkers?
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1128/p13s02-wmgn.html

They've offshored, outsourced, and privatized TIA (to Global Information Group Ltd. in the Bahamas). Now all they have to do is fire you for being 'of the wrong political party' and put false information in your background data...and voila ! You've just created the most insidious terror project INSIDE the US.

A recent link by Sen Kerry obliquely refers to this. I wish the Senator would just plainly state, as Walter Cronkite did in Oct 2004 on Larry King, that Karl Rove is doling out OBL tapes !

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Our NSA is either covering mightily for an incompetent administration or is holding back essential information and allowing OBL & Co. to continue in operation, much as a Ted Shackley 'Third Option' operation would allow for. In the meantime, domestic surveillance violating 300 million US citizens' 1st and 4th Amendment rights are being rubberstamped to allow this charade to continue.

When Wal-Mart can track underwear I just bought with RFIDs and they can't track med equipment for the 6' Saudi with health problems, as Sen Kerry alluded to, you know something's rotten in Denmark.

But remember, OBL has a kidney dialysis problem. If the NSA et al couldn't have tracked THAT equipment into the Afgan/Pakistan remote mountains, HOUSTON, we have a problem. The then Carlyle Group-owned Le Figaro noted that the CIA had a meeting with OBL in July 2001 in Dubai...For what it's worth H2OMan.