Reply #37: I think it should be labelled as such. [View All]

[darkmaestro019]

I contend that high levels of THC are not bad. Higher proofs of alcohol are labelled as such; people who don't want to get destroyed with two shots drink beer instead.

And anecdotally, I've been hearing this stuff most of my life "Now the weed is super strong!" and in all my taste tests, I have encountered varying strengths, but nothing whatsoever like the difference in effect by amount used that we seem to be told exists. Meaning, sometimes a bowl gets you buzzy, sometimes a bowl plants your ass on the couch staring at the TV, but never have I smoked ANY and been "suicidal when coming down"

Though I bet you can get much better weed outside of the States : ) I suspect it is GREATLY exaggerated as a splintering crutch for those who wish to keep this plant illegal. To the best of my reading there is no lethal level of THC.

I suggest clear labelling of the percentage of THC. Oh yes, but that would require it be legal and regulated. (drags himself out of fantasy-land)

If I had my choice, I'd probably buy the highest THC possible (well, one hit plus hitting the carpet is a bit much, lol) If I could hit the state I wish to be in with ONE HIT in a tiny onehitter instead of bowl after bowl, I'd much prefer to spare my lungs the excess smoke.

EDIT: Stupid MSM has ME putting quotes around things that don't need them.