You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #129: Perhaps, though I would characterize them differently [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #117
129. Perhaps, though I would characterize them differently
"... a symptom of the kind of women you know -- ie, those likely to be offended at a title."

I don’t think the women I know are necessarily “likely to be offended by a title.” I do think that they are, among other things, attentive to the use and politics of language and to gender inequity in the workforce and elsewhere. (That’s not to say, of course, that people who don’t object to being called girl can’t also be attentive to such things; I’m just describing people I know.) I think that “object to” and “offended by” mean different things, both denotatively and connotatively. I feel pretty confident in saying most of the women I know would generally object to (i.e., dislike, make an argument against) being called a girl (some contextual specifics, particularly involving people who are close to them, notwithstanding). I can't say with any certainty that they would be offended (being personally angered or having their feelings hurt) by it. Perhaps many would, but I think that would be more of an individual thing and depend more on context.




“But if you ask her what she's doing this weekend with her GIRLfriends, I'll bet she'd say she was having a GIRL'S night out, or getting together with the GIRLS, or...”

Well, girlfriends is different from girls, and a group of women referring to themselves as “the girls” isn’t necessarily the same as being referred to by others as girls/the girls. But, yeah, phrases like that are certainly common. I guess that’s one of those contextual exceptions.

I would even say that it’s also slightly different from addressing women as girls—were a guy to respond “have a fun girls’ night out” he might get a different reaction than if he were to respond “I hope you girls have fun,” depending on such factors as how well he knows the woman/women. I probably wouldn’t say “I hope you girls have fun” to my wife and her friends (not, for the record, because they would be likely to be offended, though depending on the friend it might suggest a familiarity that they would be uncomfortable with). I might be slightly more likely to say it to my wife and her sister/s-in-law. I wouldn’t say it to my colleagues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC